Election Results
On November 4, 2008, the Voters of Arizona delivered a clear verdict on payday lending. By an overwhelming 60% to 40% margin, Arizonans declared that payday lenders should abide by the 36 percent interest cap on loans — just like every other lender — or leave the state. No more special deals! No more predatory lending!!
The voters stated that the July 1, 2010 expiration of the payday lenders’ special deal must stay in effect.
In 29 of 30 legislative districts, every congressional district, and every county across the state, voters agreed:
NO MORE PREDATORY LENDING SCHEMES!
Make sure your legislators got the message! click here.
Prop 200 Results by Legislative District:
| Legislative District | Prop 200 ‘NO’ votes |
Prop 200 ‘Yes’ votes |
Percent ‘NO’ |
Percent ‘Yes’ |
| 1 | 59,694 | 36,748 | 61.9% | 38.1% |
| 2 | 29,673 | 25,742 | 53.5% | 46.5% |
| 3 | 37,163 | 30,073 | 55.3% | 44.7% |
| 4 | 70,200 | 51,075 | 57.9% | 42.1% |
| 5 | 38,423 | 27,106 | 58.6% | 41.4% |
| 6 | 46,144 | 33,628 | 57.8% | 42.2% |
| 7 | 47,680 | 32,137 | 59.7% | 40.3% |
| 8 | 55,487 | 36,234 | 60.5% | 39.5% |
| 9 | 40,460 | 31,896 | 55.9% | 44.1% |
| 10 | 28,792 | 21,572 | 57.2% | 42.8% |
| 11 | 52,311 | 27,491 | 65.6% | 34.4% |
| 12 | 53,447 | 47,600 | 52.9% | 47.1% |
| 13 | 14,920 | 15,539 | 49.0% | 51.0% |
| 14 | 11,033 | 10,091 | 52.2% | 47.8% |
| 15 | 23,234 | 16,005 | 59.2% | 40.8% |
| 16 | 23,580 | 22,235 | 51.5% | 48.5% |
| 17 | 36,299 | 22,218 | 62.0% | 38.0% |
| 18 | 25,977 | 17,748 | 59.4% | 40.6% |
| 19 | 44,642 | 32,230 | 58.1% | 41.9% |
| 20 | 48,478 | 29,156 | 62.4% | 37.6% |
| 21 | 58,506 | 41,854 | 58.3% | 41.7% |
| 22 | 61,932 | 44,587 | 58.1% | 41.9% |
| 23 | 51,889 | 39,301 | 56.9% | 43.1% |
| 24 | 26,391 | 14,936 | 63.9% | 36.1% |
| 25 | 40,287 | 27,376 | 59.5% | 40.5% |
| 26 | 61,873 | 28,924 | 68.1% | 31.9% |
| 27 | 35,268 | 22,209 | 61.4% | 38.6% |
| 28 | 48,231 | 20,976 | 69.7% | 30.3% |
| 29 | 27,526 | 19,068 | 59.1% | 40.9% |
| 30 | 72,177 | 34,852 | 67.4% | 32.6% |
| TOTALS | 1,271,717 | 860,607 | ||
| STATEWIDE | 60% | 40% | ||
Prop 200 Results by Congressional District:
| Congressional District |
Prop200 |
Prop200 ‘Yes’ votes |
Percent NO |
Percent Yes |
| 1 – A. Kirkpatrick (D) | 163,393 | 114,569 | 58.8% | 41.2% |
| 2 – T. Franks (R) | 188,044 | 149,796 | 55.7% | 44.3% |
| 3 – J. Shadegg (R) | 161,611 | 106,195 | 60.3% | 39.7% |
| 4 – E. Pastor (D) | 66,757 | 57,131 | 53.9% | 46.1% |
| 5 – H. Mitchell (D) | 166,230 | 104,921 | 61.3% | 38.7% |
| 6 – J. Flake (R) | 188,669 | 136,311 | 58.1% | 41.9% |
| 7 – R. Grijalva (D) | 120,374 | 84,084 | 58.9% | 41.1% |
| 8 – G. Giffords (D) | 216,639 | 107,600 | 66.8% | 33.2% |
| TOTAL | 1,271,717 | 860,607 |
Prop 200 Results by County:
For county-by-county results, click here.
**
THE VOTERS’ VERDICT WAS 100% CLEAR:
