Archive for February, 2010

MAJOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS COMMIT TO PROMOTE AUTOMATIC SAVINGS

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Arizonans for Responsible Lending posts the following Press Release as a public service:

Consumer Federation of America
The Financial Services Roundtable
Employee Benefit Research Institute

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE — February 18, 2010




New survey shows Americans believe banks could help low- and moderate-income families save by offering and promoting low balance requirements and Automatic Savings

Major Financial Institutions Commit to Promote Automatic Savings

PRESS CONTACTS:
Jack Gillis, Consumer Federation of America, 202-737-0766
Elise Brooks, Financial Services Roundtable, 202-589-2427

WASHINGTON, DC – Kicking off a new historic partnership, The Financial Services Roundtable, Consumer Federation of America (CFA), and Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) released new data on how America saves.  They also announced a commitment to promote automatic saving, especially by low- and moderate-income households.

Said Ron O’Hanley, President & CEO of BNY Mellon Asset Management and Co-Chair of The Roundtable’s Council on Asset Management:  “This savings crisis ranges from the many low- and moderate-income families who do not have an emergency savings fund to cover unexpected expenses to the retirement crisis that threatens the retirement security of the vast majority of Americans.”  And he added: “Research has repeatedly shown that the most effective way to save for anything is through auto-savings.”

The three groups released new data on saving, consumer attitudes about saving, bank automatic savings products and promotion, a best practices commitment, and financial institution participation in next week’s America Saves Week.

  • A new analysis of the Fed’s latest Survey of Consumer Finances data found that less than one-third (32%) of low-income households and less than half (48%) of moderate-income households, but four-fifths (80%) of upper-income households, have savings or money market accounts.
  • A nationwide survey this month learned that a large majority of Americans (83%) believe the most effective way to build personal savings is to automatically transfer funds from paycheck or checking to savings or investments.  And a large majority (78%) believes that if banks and credit unions made it a priority to promote and offer automatic savings incentives, American families would save more effectively.
  • Research on large bank practices found that nearly all offer free regular transfers from checking, and a majority lower minimums when regular automatic deposits are made, but only some institutions offer incentives for customers to save automatically.
  • The Roundtable and CFA announce new best automatic savings practices for banks and commit to promote these best practices.
  • Major financial institutions have agreed to use the America Saves Week logo in ads, websites, and/or flyers.

Many American Families Don’t Have Savings Accounts

Recent research completed for CFA by Ohio State Professor Catherine Montalto, using the latest Federal Reserve Board Survey of Consumer Finances data, revealed that most low- and moderate-income households don’t have savings accounts.

  • Less than one-third (32%) of low-income households – bottom quintile with incomes below $18,900 in 2007 – have savings or money market accounts.
  • Less than one-half (48%) of moderate-income households – second quintile with incomes $18,900-33,899 – have savings or money market accounts.
  • Even less than three-fifths (58%) of middle-income households – third quintile with incomes $33,899-53,599 – have an account.
  • But 80% of upper-income households – highest quintile with income above $89,300 – have an account.

“Most of the families without savings accounts do not even have adequate funds to cover emergency expenditures, let alone to save for homeownership or retirement,” said CFA Executive Director Stephen Brobeck.  “But most do have a checking account so have a convenient opportunity to save automatically,” he added.

Most Americans Support Automatic Savings at Banks and Credit Unions

A nationwide survey of more than 1000 representative adult Americans, commissioned by CFA and undertaken by Opinion Research Corporation in early February, revealed that:

  • A large majority of Americans (83% vs. 15%) agree the “most effective way to build personal savings is to do so automatically by agreeing in advance to transfer funds regularly from a paycheck or checking to savings or investments.”
  • A large majority (78% vs. 20%) also believe that if banks and credit unions “made it a priority to promote and offer incentives for all their customers to save automatically, this would help American families save more effectively.”  Low (74%) and moderate (78%) income households agree.
  • Moreover, a large majority (69% vs. 26%) believe that banks’ and credit unions’ “eliminating opening and minimum balance requirements, as long as the customer agrees to an automatic transfer of at least $25 each month from checking,” is a positive development.  And low (64%) and moderate (68%) income households agree.

Most Big Banks Offer But Do Not Yet Effectively Promote Automatic Savings

A survey conducted earlier this year by The Financial Services Roundtable of the automatic savings products and promotion by 22 of its members, which include most of the nation’s largest banks, and recent research by the Consumer Federation in the websites of the 50 largest banks by number of branches, revealed widespread offering, but not promotion, of automatic savings from checking accounts.

  • Nearly all banks offer free regular transfers from checking to saving.
  • A majority of all banks surveyed lower minimums when regular automatic deposits are made – e.g., 16 of the 22 banks surveyed by The Roundtable.
  • This automatic savings is often linked to customer saving for a specific goal such as Christmas, a home, education, or medical care.
  • Some banks surveyed offer an incentive – such as higher interest, matched interest, cash bonus, gift card – to save automatically.  For example:
    • Fifth Third Bank provides a double interest bonus to those who meet a goal in the Goal Setter Savings.
    • U.S. Bank offers a $50 Rewards Card for the first $1,000 in savings and another $50 Rewards Card if that balance is maintained for a year in its S.T.A.R.T. Savings Today and Rewards Tomorrow program.
    • SunTrust, in its Get Started Savings Program that in March will become its Live Solid Savings, offers a 1.5% rate for two months and a 2% anniversary bonus (up to $50) as well as free overdraft protection for those agreeing to automatically transfer at least $25 monthly to savings.
    • Regions, in its LifeGreen Savings, provides a 1% interest rate bonus if automatic deposits are made for 12 months.
    • BBVA Compass, in its Build My SavingsSM, will match, on an annual basis, up to 6% of a customer’s monthly automatic savings transfer amount. This program will be launching in April.
    • Bank of America, in its Keep the Change program, rounds up debit card purchases and transfers the difference from checking to savings where it provides a 100% match for three months then matches 5% a year (up to $250/year).
  • The Way2Save® account, created by Wachovia, will be offered to Wells Fargo customers in the future. It’s a savings account that can be linked to checking, turning purchases into automatic savings by transferring $1 from checking to the Way2Save® account each time you make a check card purchase or use bill pay.
  • There is evidence that the promotion of automatic savings can be effective.  In the Roundtable survey:
    • SunTrust reported that it had sold more than 100,000 of its Get Started Savings accounts in the past year.
    • Regions reported that, because of their LifeGreen Savings program, the percentage of those opening a checking account who also opened a savings account rose from one-fifth to one-half.
    • Huntington reported that new checking customers responded to letters promoting automatic savings at twice the rate they have responded to other direct mail offers.
    • Bank of America has enrolled more than 12 million customers, who have saved over $3 billion, in its Keep the Change program.
    • One out of every three new U.S. Bank customers are enrolling in S.T.A.R.T. where it is available.

“Decades ago the Christmas Club account was a mainstay community activity at many banks, where it helped instill a culture of saving for the future that credit cards and easy credit eroded,” said EBRI President Dallas Salisbury.  “Banks need to renew that primary value in the community by teaching customers the value of saving and providing innovative products to make this possible,” he added.

Financial Services Roundtable Announces Commitment to Promote Automatic Savings

The Financial Services Roundtable announced its commitment to promote savings in two important ways.  First, through its Council on Asset Management, it has encouraged members to participate actively and visibly in next week’s America Saves Week.  That participation includes:

  • Dreyfus putting the America Saves Week logo in ads, in Dreyfus Financial Centers, and on their website;
  • US Bank incorporating the logo into television and radio advertisements as well as print insertions;
  • Wells Fargo putting the logo on flyers in stores; and
  • Union Bank offering a $25 bonus to those opening a new savings account.

Second, with CFA, The Roundtable has developed Best Practices for Automatic Savings and committed to promoting these best practices to its members.  The practices are:

  • Free automatic transfers from checking to savings.
  • Low minimums for automatic savers.
  • Incentives for customers to use automatic savings.
  • Good disclosure of automatic savings options.
  • Active promotion of these options.
  • Increased percentage of checking customers, especially small depositors, who save automatically.

“The Roundtable will do everything in its power to encourage retail banks to adopt these practices to improve their programs so that they meet these criteria,” said Roundtable President Steve Bartlett.  “Moreover, we commit to publishing a review of our progress in one year,” he added.

“The Consumer Federation commends The Roundtable for taking this initiative,” said CFA’s Brobeck.  “Not only will bank customers benefit, over time so will banks and the whole nation,” he added.

The Financial Services Roundtable represents 100 of the largest integrated financial services companies providing banking, insurance, and investment products and services to the American consumer.

The Consumer Federation of America is a non-profit association of some 280 consumer groups that, since 1968, has sought to advance the consumer interest through research, advocacy, and education.

The Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) is a private, nonprofit research institute based in Washington, DC, that focuses on health, savings, retirement, and economic security issues. EBRI does not lobby and does not take policy positions.

# # #

Paid for by Arizonans for Responsible Lending

Major Funding by AARP Arizona
Center for Responsible Lending, N.C., SEIU, Washington, and SIMG, Tucson.
Additional Support from Arizona State Credit Union, UFCW Local 99 Arizona
The Arizona Credit Union League, and Mi Familia Vota.

www.NoMoreLoanSharks.com

Desperation and Money

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Dear Supporters,

The payday loan industry is up against the wall. 

They’re down to their final week — this week — to try to pass a bill through committee and the House Floor, before the House and the Senate begin taking up legislation from the opposite chamber.

This is a critical moment in the campaign to protect the will of the voters and uphold the 2010 sunset.  Please call your representatives today:

Tell them to uphold the payday loan sunset!

With their backs firmly against the wall, the payday lenders have opened their checkbooks in ways that are both disturbing and shocking, even for this industry.

They’re trying to pick up at least one Democratic vote in the House and stop the bleeding of Republican votes.

To do so, they’ve taken to:

  • Hiring any lobbyist that will take their money.  To date, the payday lenders already have 13 lobbyists working the Arizona Legislature, not including Grant Woods and Chuck Coughlin, key advisers to the Governor, who are working the community;
  • Wining and dining legislators at unprecedented levels;
  • Flying in industry executives, former NFL stars and others to try to persuade legislators to let them stay;
  • Showing up at community leaders’ homes unannounced and after hours to try to get an audience and change their minds;
  • Hiring popular bloggers to repeat their talking points;
  • Stacking the membership of the Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce and other chambers in order to “win” their endorsement; and
  • Attempting to hire yet more lobbying firms, particularly major in-state Democratic firms, while making it clear that cost is no object…

All told, they must be spending north of $200,000 a month trying to save their usurious business model in Arizona. And it could be a lot more.

As disturbing as these tactics are, we have seen them before.  This is, after all, the same industry that spent $14.8 million trying to promote their phony “reform” initiative in 2008.

And all the while, they are drafting new legislative language that is riddled with loopholes and ultimately still allows their predatory, triple-digit interest rates.

The payday lenders are pulling out all the stops. And they’re talking to your Representatives every day…

Your Representatives need to hear from YOU today!

If you are not certain who your state representatives are, simply enter your address here to find out.

Call your representatives TODAY and demand that they uphold the will of the voters.

Tell them, “The Sun Must Set on 400%.  Period.”

Thank you,

David Higuera
Arizonans for Responsible Lending

~~~

Paid for by Arizonans for Responsible Lending

Major Funding by AARP Arizona
Center for Responsible Lending, N.C., SEIU, Washington, and SIMG, Tucson.
Additional Support from Arizona State Credit Union, UFCW Local 99 Arizona
The Arizona Credit Union League, and Mi Familia Vota.

www.NoMoreLoanSharks.com

Math doesn’t work for AZ payday loan industry

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

By Paul Davenport, Associated Press, in the Arizona Capitol Times:

The math isn’t adding up for Arizona’s payday loan industry.

The industry that provides small short-term loans is fighting in the Legislature to keep itself alive beyond a June 30 termination date that was included in the authorization law enacted 10 years ago.

Almost a month after the bill failed to even reach its first hurdle – a committee vote in the House – the measure remains stalled, even though the industry has earned the recent backing of several major business advocacy groups.

The bill was blasted by lawmakers from both parties after voters in 2008 soundly rejected an initiative that would have allowed the lenders to stay open permanently. Rep. Andy Tobin of Paulden, the bill’s Republican sponsor, said the lack so far of significant bipartisan support could doom the measure in the 60-member House.

“I’m not going to push to get 31 Republican members on this when the industry needs to go out and make this work,” he said. “They failed the last time. Now they’ve got another opportunity. Maybe you figure it might be their last opportunity.”

Payday lenders operate under a temporary exemption from Arizona’s 36-percent cap on annual interest rates. They charge $17.65 per $100 borrowed for a two-week loan, which amounts to an annual rate above 400 percent. The exemption expires on June 30.

Payday lending opponents say the industry preys on poor people in desperate situations, sometimes trapping them in a cycle of debt where they use one payday loan to pay off another.

Industry proponents say the market has shown a need for short-term, small-dollar loans that aren’t generally available from banks or credit unions. They say the industry supports low-income families that otherwise wouldn’t have access to credit in an emergency.

The Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce wouldn’t support the 2008 ballot measure because Arizona’s protections for voter-approved laws would have made it hard to change later on. But the current pending legislation doesn’t pose that problem, said Michelle Bolton, a chamber vice president.

Both the Phoenix and the Arizona chambers of commerce have lauded the pending bill’s regulatory and consumer-protection provisions.

“We’re talking with lawmakers. We’re asking them to consider it,” Bolton said. “We’re telling them this is a much better way to consider the sunset and have much better oversight.”

Lawmakers in recent weeks have engaged in quiet negotiations. Several people familiar with the talks said they’re hung up on a core issue: how much interest can payday lenders charge their customers?

Rep. Ed Ableser, minority House Democrats’ point man in the talks, said he’s fighting to hold the industry to 36 percent. But industry lobbyist Lee Miller said that rate wouldn’t generate enough revenue to cover overhead costs.

Miller acknowledged that the industry’s critics have the leverage of the June 30 sunset: The industry dies with no reauthorization.

To add your comments at AzCapitolTimes.com, click here.

Mesa officials: Payday lenders need to scram

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

In the East Valley Trib:

Mesa wants one of its most visible industries to vanish in one fell swoop.

Despite payday lenders’ efforts to stay alive in the state, Mesa is pushing for its 83 payday loan stores to go away as of July 1 and take away their neon signs, flashing lights and people waving banners and signs at passing traffic.

The stores give the community a low-end image, Mesa’s elected officials say, especially when they dominate so many major intersections.

The stores have hobbled efforts to get what Councilman Dave Richins considers legitimate businesses in west Mesa. Their in-your-face signs make it more difficult for him to stomach them, he said.

“If they were one business in a single strip center and they looked like any other business in a strip center, I don’t think most people would bat an eye. But they go out of their way to be obnoxious,” Richins said. “It’s like come on, guys. They cannot help themselves.”

More than a dozen west Mesa corners have at least two stores, while University Drive and Alma School Road has five nearby.

The Arizona Legislature opened the doors to payday loans a decade ago, with a provision that the authorization would expire July 1. The industry is fighting to stay alive, but Mesa’s City Council wants lawmakers to block any of those attempts.

“This issue is a vampire,” Councilman Dennis Kavanaugh said. “We need to put a stake in it.”

The businesses aren’t good corporate citizens, he said, as they haven’t joined the Chamber of Commerce, given to the arts or contributed in other ways, Kavanaugh said.

The industry placed an initiative on the 2008 ballot that would have let the businesses operate indefinitely, but 59 percent of voters rejected that despite the industry spending more than $11 million on its campaign.

The industry floated one plan, HB2161, at the Legislature this year that would let the stores continue to operate.

The measure stalled in a committee when it became clear supporters didn’t have enough votes, said state Sen. Debbie McCune Davis, D-Phoenix. She is also a co-chairwoman of Arizonans for Responsible Lending, which opposed the 2008 ballot proposition.

The election showed strong opposition, McCune Davis said, and has played a role in the lack of support the industry now has at the Legislature. But payday loan operators are still trying, she said.

“The industry continues to be present at the Legislature, and they continue to be present in the community, trying to convince folks that their services have high value and that the voters’ sentiment should be ignored,” McCune Davis said.

A lobbyist for the industry did not return a call for comment.

Before 2000, Arizona limited interest rates to 36 percent a year, but lawmakers created an exemption for payday lenders, which can charge rates of more than 450 percent.

Critics say the practice amounts to loan-sharking, but the industry argues the two-week loans are a fast and popular way to get a loan for unexpected expenses.

Mesa’s City Council recently agreed to oppose any bill that would let the stores operate past this summer, regardless of what reforms are offered. Mayor Scott Smith said he doubted the intention of any changes, and Councilwoman Dina Higgins said elected officials would be defying voters if they allowed the stores to continue operating.

Mesa tried to reduce store clustering in 2007 by prohibiting them from opening within 1,200 feet of one another. But at least a dozen west Mesa areas had stores within that distance by the time the City Council approved the restriction, and existing stores were grandfathered.

Since the restriction, no new shops have applied to open in Mesa, said Gordon Sheffield, the city’s zoning administrator.

The industry has argued its demise would create a problem for Mesa by emptying a large number of storefronts, Richins said. He said new stores would fill the void, saying shoppers would find a better mix of stores in the city.

“I want diversity in our retail,” he said.

McCune Davis also wants to reduce the number of stores but said even if they lose their ability to operate, the shops will still have a large presence. Many of them also offer auto loans, check cashing and other services, she said.

“There’s no question that it will have some impact on commercial property, but it’s nowhere near what they’re suggesting in terms of impact,” she said.

Related

Lawmaker deals payday loan industry setback

Lawmaker seeks to keep payday lending legal

To add your comments to this story, click here.

Civic Leaders Oppose Payday Loans

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 16, 2010
Contact:

David Higuera
ARL Political Director
(520) 907-2080,  david@nomoreloansharks.com

Civic Leaders across the State

Register Their Disapproval with 400% Payday Lending

Cities of Mesa, Phoenix and Tucson agree: The Sun Must Set on 400%

TUCSON – Last week, the Mesa City Council announced their opposition to the re-authorization of 400% payday lending in Arizona.  The Council made clear that the July 1, 2010 payday loan sunset must stay in effect, thus reinforcing the Consumer Loan Act’s 36% interest rate cap on all small-dollar loans.

Mesa joins the City of Phoenix and the City of Tucson, both of which took stands against payday loan re-authorization legislation in the last couple of weeks.

As quoted in Friday’s Arizona Republic, Mesa City Council Member Dennis Kavanaugh compared the payday loan industry to a vampire, saying, “They suck money out of the community and contribute little.”

Added Council Member Dave Richins, regarding the payday lenders’ claim that enforcing the 36% cap will force them to shut down and leave commercial properties vacant, “I really think more legitimate businesses will move into the vacuum.”

The Phoenix City Council also instructed its intergovernmental affairs team last week to oppose any legislation that would repeal or extend the 2010 payday loan sunset.

Stated Phoenix City Council Member Tom Simplot, “We must stand together to fight the insidious payday loan industry that preys upon the most vulnerable while denigrating our neighborhoods.”

The City of Tucson issued its 2010 Legislative Agenda on January 26th, which highlights the City’s top four legislative priorities for the year.  Among them: “Urge the State Legislature to stand against exploitative payday lending practices in Arizona and oppose efforts to extend these practices indefinitely.”

Stated Tucson City Council Member Karin Uhlich, who is also director of the Center for Economic Integrity, “It’s amazing to me that any legislator would even consider voting for a bill to extend a lifeline to payday lenders.  The voters were quite clear: the July 1st sunset cannot arrive soon enough!”

# # #

Paid for by Arizonans for Responsible Lending

Major Funding by AARP Arizona
Center for Responsible Lending, N.C., SEIU, Washington, and SIMG, Tucson.
Additional Support from Arizona State Credit Union, UFCW Local 99 Arizona
The Arizona Credit Union League, and Mi Familia Vota.

www.NoMoreLoanSharks.com

Capitol insiders agree: 400% payday loans must end

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 10, 2010

Contact: David Higuera
A.R.L. Political Director (520) 907-2080


Arizona Capitol Times Poll — 7 out of 10 Capitol Insiders Agree with the Voters:

400% Payday Loans Must End

PHOENIX — “Payday lenders — should they stay, or should they go?”  Despite the voters’ overwhelming rejection of payday loans, this question has been circulating around the Capitol for months now.  And now it is a poll being asked at AZCapitolTimes.com.

The mandate remains clear: They should go.

“On November 4, 2008, a statewide poll was taken to determine the answer to this very question,” commented Debbie McCune Davis, co-chair of Arizonans for Responsible Lending.

The result?  1,271,717 Arizonans said: THEY MUST GO.

“Sixty percent of Arizona voters rejected the payday lenders’ arguments that they should be allowed to stay,” said McCune Davis.  “Under normal circumstances, the election would have decided it, but of course, the payday industry doesn’t play by the same rules as the rest of us.”

Commented ARL Co-Chair Marian McClure, “Rather than respect the voters’ wishes, the payday lenders continue to hire Arizona lobbyists left and right and fly in their hired guns from out of state every week.  They’re trying to convince the Legislature to ignore the will of the people — in fact, to undermine it.”

Among the horde of high dollar lobbyists hired by the payday lenders are former attorney general Grant Woods, Gov. Brewer’s consulting firm HighGround, former Napolitano aide Mario E Diaz, former labor leader Mike Vespoli, the conservative blogger “Espresso Pundit” and other insiders.

The result of this very expensive industry push?

According to the Capitol Times’ online poll, more than 70% of Capitol insiders think payday lenders “should not be allowed in Arizona.”

“It is interesting that after two years of being bombarded with every imaginable argument about why they should be allowed to stay, voters and Capitol insiders remain steadfast in their conclusion — it is time to end 400% interest payday loans,” stated ARL political director David Higuera.

# # #

For more information about Arizonans for Responsible Lending, a statewide coalition of more than 200 organizations and community leaders working to uphold the July 1, 2010 payday loan sunset, click here.


Paid for by Arizonans for Responsible Lending

Major Funding by AARP Arizona
Center for Responsible Lending, N.C., SEIU, Washington, and SIMG, Tucson.
Additional Support from Arizona State Credit Union, UFCW Local 99
The Arizona Credit Union League, and Mi Familia Vota.

www.NoMoreLoanSharks.com

++