Trib: Mesa to fight any help for payday lenders

In today’s East Valley Tribune, another indication that the people have spoken, and the Legislature better listen:

Mesa will oppose any efforts in the state Legislature to extend or eliminate a 2010 deadline that will end licensing of the payday lending industry.

A City Council subcommittee supported that recommendation from Mesa’s government relations director, Scott Butler, who told the group Thursday that despite a failed ballot initiative in November that would have kept the industry alive after 2010, the payday backers may not be done.

They’re trying to get rid of what’s known as the sunset clause, which would end their licenses in the state by July 1, 2010, he said.

Butler said it’s possible that legislation could be introduced this session to increase the shelf life of the payday loan industry.

A payday loan industry spokesman, however, said later Thursday that there are no current plans to advocate changes in payday loan businesses in this legislative session.

In 2000, Arizona allowed payday lenders to set up shop in the state for 10 years.

With more than 95 payday lending stores, Mesa is at the forefront of this issue.

West Mesa is particularly chock-full of these stores, which offer check-cashing services and short-term loans with interest rates that skyrocket up to 459 percent for a two-week loan. In fact, the city’s ZIP code 85201 has the highest concentration of these businesses in the state.

Vice Mayor Kyle Jones as well as Councilmen Dennis Kavanaugh and Alex Finter agreed that the city should fight any attempts to keep the industry in business in the state.

Payday lending costs Arizona families nearly $149 million each year, according to a Mesa report. Critics view these lending services as predatory, targeting low-income families who turn to these quick-fix measures at times to get through rough times. They also bring with them public safety problems.

The payday loan industry, which backed Proposition 200, spent $14 million promoting the initiative, which would have kept interest rates at up to 391 percent.

Proponents claim that these short-term loans are at times the only recourse for some people in times of hardship. Additionally, other financial entities such as credit card companies also charge interest year-round, until a bill is paid.

To see original article, click here.

Leave a Reply